K Murugesu V Nadarajah

Nadarajah 1980 2 mlj 82 the appellant agreed to sell a house to the respondent and the agreement was written on a scrap of paper.

K murugesu v nadarajah. An agreement was written on a scrap paper and says as follows. Law law486 spring 2016. Comm law 101 fall 2016. In the case of k murugesu v nadarajah 1980 2 mlj 82 the respondent was the tenant of the appellant.

Promise to pay the sum of rm10 000. Consists of a promise is said to be executed case reference. See murugesu v nadarajah 1980 2 mlj 82 m agreed to sell his house to n. A man offers and performs his services in a circumstances he obviously expects to be paid for.

Knowledge of custom or trade usage cunliffe owen v teather greenwood if the. The case of carlill v carbolic smoke ball co ibid is an example of executed consideration where the defendants advertised the promise of a reward for persons to use their smoke balls in a certain manner. The appellant finally relented and wrote on a piece of paper an agreement to sell the respondent the said house for rm26 000 within three months from the date of the agreement. Here the promise to sell is in return to promise to buy.

The federal court rejected the appeal. Consideration law 3235 sem 2 2013 2014 7. M promised to sell his mobile phone to k for rm550 and k promised to pay the price upon delivery by m. Executed consideration one party has fulfilled his part of the consideration leaving a liability on the party of the other party his part of the outstanding consideration mutual promises example.

In the case of k murugesu v nadarajah 1980 2 mlj 82 the respondent was the. Specific performance was ordered at trial and the appellant took the matter to the federal court. Contract notes content of contract. Murugesu v nadarajah 1980 2 mlj 82 16 10 15 jamaludin yaakob 17 consideration 18.

B s consideration for a. Nadarajah 1980 law of contract.